Cleared Traditional

K051648 - SPOTCHEM II INOGANIC PHOSPHORUS, CPK AND URIC ACID TESTS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2006
Decision
224d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K051648 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SPOTCHEM II INOGANIC PHOSPHORUS, CPK AND URIC ACID TESTS. Classified as Nad Reduction/nadh Oxidation, Cpk Or Isoenzymes (product code CGS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Arkray, Inc. (Cortlandt Manor, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 31, 2006 after a review of 224 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1215 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Arkray, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K051648 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 21, 2005
Decision Date January 31, 2006
Days to Decision 224 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
136d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 224d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CGS Nad Reduction/nadh Oxidation, Cpk Or Isoenzymes
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1215
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.