Cleared Traditional

K131600 - URS-2GP (GLUCOSE PROTEIN) URINE STRIPS (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2014
Decision
360d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K131600 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the URS-2GP (GLUCOSE PROTEIN) URINE STRIPS. Classified as Method, Enzymatic, Glucose (urinary, Non-quantitative) (product code JIL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Teco Diagnostics (Anaheim, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 29, 2014 after a review of 360 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1340 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Teco Diagnostics devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K131600 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 03, 2013
Decision Date May 29, 2014
Days to Decision 360 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
272d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 360d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JIL Method, Enzymatic, Glucose (urinary, Non-quantitative)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1340
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.