Cleared Traditional

K942813 - DIASTAT ANTI-PR3 (C-ANCA) KIT

K942813 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for DIASTAT ANTI-PR3 (C-ANCA) KIT by Shield Diagnostics, Ltd.. It is a Class 2 Immunology device (product code MOB) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 265-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 1995
Decision
265d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K942813 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DIASTAT ANTI-PR3 (C-ANCA) KIT. Classified as Test System, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (anca) (product code MOB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Shield Diagnostics, Ltd. (Dundee, GB). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 6, 1995 after a review of 265 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5660 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Shield Diagnostics, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K942813 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 14, 1994
Decision Date March 06, 1995
Days to Decision 265 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
161d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 265d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MOB Test System, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (anca)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5660
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.