Cleared Traditional

K953587 - VARELISA MPO-ANCA

K953587 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for VARELISA MPO-ANCA by Elias U.S.A., Inc.. It is a Class 2 Immunology device (product code MOB) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 178-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1996
Decision
178d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K953587 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the VARELISA MPO-ANCA. Classified as Test System, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (anca) (product code MOB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Elias U.S.A., Inc. (Osceola, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 26, 1996 after a review of 178 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5660 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Elias U.S.A., Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K953587 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 01, 1995
Decision Date January 26, 1996
Days to Decision 178 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
74d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 178d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MOB Test System, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (anca)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5660
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.