Cleared Traditional

EL-B2GP1SCR (K973882) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K973882 · Theratest Laboratories, Inc. · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1997
Decision
52d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K973882 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EL-B2GP1SCR. Classified as System,test,antibodies,b2 - Glycoprotein I (b2 - Gpi) (product code MSV), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Theratest Laboratories, Inc. (Chicago, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 5, 1997 after a review of 52 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5660 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Theratest Laboratories, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K973882 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 14, 1997
Decision Date December 05, 1997
Days to Decision 52 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
52d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 52d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MSV System,test,antibodies,b2 - Glycoprotein I (b2 - Gpi)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5660
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.