Cleared Abbreviated

K983769 - DISTAFLO BYPASS GRAFT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through the Abbreviated 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1998
Decision
50d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K983769 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DISTAFLO BYPASS GRAFT. Classified as Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of Less Then 6mm Diameter (product code DYF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Impra, Inc. (Tempe, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 15, 1998 after a review of 50 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.3450 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Abbreviated 510(k) pathway was used, relying on FDA-recognized standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Device pattern: Standards-based predicate clearance. Standards-verified equivalence. The Abbreviated pathway signals strong alignment with FDA-recognized performance standards - typically associated with lower review burden and faster clearance cycles.

View all Impra, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K983769 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 26, 1998
Decision Date December 15, 1998
Days to Decision 50 days
Submission Type Abbreviated
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
75d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 50d
Pathway characteristics
Standards-based clearance path.

Device Classification

Product Code DYF Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of Less Then 6mm Diameter
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.3450
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.