Cleared Traditional

K984496 - ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION EXPRESS CHEST DRAIN (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1999
Decision
139d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K984496 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ATRIUM MEDICAL CORPORATION EXPRESS CHEST DRAIN. Classified as Bottle, Collection, Vacuum (product code KDQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Atrium Medical Corp. (Hudson, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 5, 1999 after a review of 139 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.6740 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Atrium Medical Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K984496 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 17, 1998
Decision Date May 05, 1999
Days to Decision 139 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
11d slower than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 139d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KDQ Bottle, Collection, Vacuum
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.6740
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.