Cleared Traditional

K990323 - TE ME NA POLYSTIM NERVE STIMILATOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2001
Decision
969d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K990323 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TE ME NA POLYSTIM NERVE STIMILATOR. Classified as Stimulator, Nerve, Battery-powered (product code BXN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Te ME NA S.A.R.L. (Oldsmar, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 28, 2001 after a review of 969 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.2775 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Anesthesiology submissions.

View all Te ME NA S.A.R.L. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K990323 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 02, 1999
Decision Date September 28, 2001
Days to Decision 969 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
830d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 969d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code BXN Stimulator, Nerve, Battery-powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.2775
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.